Friday, December 7, 2012

Students learn they can empathize those with disabilities

Students Get Real Insight Into Abilities

Growing up, I remember the children in“special ed” seemed to live in an alternate universe within our school. Regardless of the distinctions in their challenges, they all were placed together in one class, shuttled around as one throng, rarely included in the activities the rest of us took for granted.
Mercifully, we’ve come a long way (not far enough, of course, but ‘tis the season of being thankful, so I’m offering this as an example of progress.)
My sixth-grader came home recently brimming with thoughts after a lesson on empathy and disabilities at her school. October was Disabilities Awareness Month. I didn’t know anything about it so my first understanding came only through my daughter who has a reporter’s eye for detail and a willingness to tell her mom all about her day.
She said they had a lesson in what it felt like to have certain disabilities. Instead of just talking about it or showing a video, they let the students experience of each challenge.
“For dyslexia, we got to read from a page that was impossible to understand it was so mixed up,” she said.
“What did that teach you?” I asked.
“That your brain has to work really, really hard if you have dyslexia and that it’s really cool how they can teach you to retrain your brain to make learning easier,” she explained.
She went on to describe how the lesson included demonstrations of people talking really loud and then having Post-it notes tickling the backs of their necks to help them experience the sensory overload often felt by children with autism.
Here’s how the lesson was later described on the school newsletter:
“Our special education staff and social workers set up hands-on stations in the library. At these stations, activities were set up for all staff to role-play a moment in the life of a student with a learning disability. Examples included an autistic student in the classroom, a student taking a test with ADHD, a student reading with the challenge of dyslexia, and a fine and gross motor activity demonstrated how impairment can affect the simplest tasks. Teachers and administrators were engaged in the activities and felt they really were reminded about the challenges many of our students face.”
After the experience, my daughter said all the kids were talking about how they all felt like they had “some parts of all the disabilities.” She said a lot of the kids said “hey, I feel like that a lot,” or “I get nervous when that happens all the time.” She said the chance to “live” with the disability and hear it described so vividly—even for only a few minutes –made a huge impression on her classmates, many of whom were convinced they, too, share similar challenges.
This kind of empathy can only be learned through living it. And it is a priceless life lesson.
As an educator, I see this as experiential learning and social justice teaching at its best. As a parent, I am even more grateful.
Cytrynbaum is executive director of the Chicago Innocence Project and teaches a city-wide investigative journalism course

MEA President talks about the Freedom to Freeload Bill

Statement from MEA President Steve Cook on deceptive ’Freedom to Freeload’ bill

EAST LANSING, Mich., Dec. 6, 2012 — Gov. Rick Snyder and Republican leadership today announced they would push so-called “right-to-work” bills that include public and private workers while carving out exemptions for police and firefighters. Swift legislative action on these bills is already underway. The following statement can be attributed to Michigan Education Association President Steve Cook:
“As time is ticking on the lame duck Legislature, extremist politicians are in a hurry to continue their assault on working families while exacting political revenge against union members who didn’t support their bids for reelection. Today’s swift announcement, introduction and subsequent passage of so-called ‘right-to-work’ legislation is just another political attack on Michigan’s middle class, and it does nothing to help dig our state out of an economic hole. 
“We elected leaders who we thought would work together to create jobs, steer our economy back to fiscal strength, and restore the American Dream for the middle class. Instead, Governor Snyder and his allies in the Legislature are fulfilling their extremist agenda by going after working families—setting the wrong priorities and making the wrong choices.
“Let’s be clear. This legislation is not about improving the economy or creating jobs—this is political payback that puts big corporations and special-interest CEOs before Michigan’s working families. In states with so-called ‘right-to-work’ laws, workers make an average of $1,500 less per year, 21 percent more people lack health insurance and workplace deaths are 51 percent higher than states without the law. On average, workers in ‘right-to-work’ states have a lower standard of living, bring home less pay and go without health insurance more frequently. That hurts small businesses as consumer spending is reduced, causing a ripple effect that will further hurt Michigan’s economy.
“Worst of all is the utter lies about what this does. No one is forced to join a union – that’s already illegal. This allows workers to get out of paying their fair share of what it costs to negotiate the contract they benefit from.  Whether proponents call this ‘right-to-work’ or ‘freedom-to-work’, it’s really just ‘Freedom to Freeload.’
“This deceptive and divisive concept will not help Michigan’s economy get back on track. As we have seen in other states like Ohio and Wisconsin, everyone gets hurt when politicians put their agendas ahead of the people who elected them. Instead of distractions that silence the voices of workers, our elected leaders should focus on finding ways to create more jobs, help struggling families and get our state’s economy moving again.”

Contact: Doug Pratt, MEA Director of Public Affairs, 517-337-5566

Thursday, December 6, 2012

A classroom for teachers a hands on way to learn their craft

     If there is one thing I am trying to do with the Master Educator blog is to show how best practices through research and data and effectively brought into the classroom is the cornerstone on how to help students learn. To take it one step further, using video to demonstrate these practices and tell the story and show how students benefit from the practice will drive the profession one step forward. The following story below comes from the Detroit News and is a well written one at that.

A classroom for teachers

Teaching lab offers educators a hands-on way to hone their craft- By Jennifer Chambers-  The Detroit News

Deborah Loewenberg Ball, dean of the University of Michigan School of Education, works with students from Ypsilanti Public Schools during the Elementary Mathematics Laboratory program. Ball said the lab makes teaching more open so people can see the work 3 million people are doing in the United States. (Bryan Mitchell / Special to The Detroit News)
Great teachers are not born — they're taught. That philosophy is the impetus behind a two-week teaching lab held annually at the University of Michigan's School of Education, where the teacher and her methods are under study by educators, policymakers and others who hope to learn more about what makes a great educator.
Every day for two weeks, a special mathematics class for underperforming upper elementary students from Ypsilanti Public Schools is taught by Deborah Loewenberg Ball, an experienced elementary school teacher who is also dean of the U-M School of Education.
The 2 1/2-hour class is conducted in a format similar to a surgical theater, where Ball performs a live teaching lesson with about two dozen students who have been asked to solve math problems individually and as a group.
Cameras tape the experience and microphones record student answers and Ball's techniques. A short distance away, adults watch, take notes and study Ball as she engages children in math.
Head of a Michigan council tasked with developing a new statewide teacher evaluation tool, Ball is known nationally for her work on teacher development practices. She said there are few opportunities for teachers to analyze the moves they make to help students learn.
The lab, Ball said, serves as a rich and unique setting for professional development for classroom teachers because it offers the opportunity to see teaching "live," watch the growth of students from one day to the next and discuss the work of teaching in public and in detail.
"Teaching is done behind closed doors. They (teachers) can describe it but they hardly ever get to watch the work of getting kids to pay attention and explain particular content," Ball said.
"This is putting teaching in the centerpieces and allowing educators with different kinds of expertise to talk about how would you get a student to pay attention. Everyone can benefit from having this by taking it back to their own practice."
In a classroom down the hall from the teaching lab on U-M's Ann Arbor campus, Ball meets with observers before the session with the children begins.
"We know math. How would we talk it? How should you say it to the children?" Ball poses to the group.
"Children don't have a concept of net worth or being in debt, so what are we trying to accomplish? Many students have not been taught mathematics as they should have been. They need a gateway — a framework in their mind."
Math — rather than English or reading — was chosen for the lab course because it is particularly difficult to teach, Ball said, and researchers know many students are having difficulty learning it.
"One of the reasons teaching math is so difficult is because most Americans haven't learned math very well," Ball said.
"It turns out when you are talking to students and trying to make it make sense, the fact you know the answer doesn't get you very much when you are trying to explain it. It's not obvious how you explain adding a negative number, and when you do it … you often say things that are confusing and wrong."
That's why the teaching lab works — it's where mistakes are made and then discussed with suggestions for future teaching methods, observers say.
Inside the School of Education at U-M, the lab is underway with 27 students seated at a U-shaped table all facing Ball, who stands in the middle.
One part of the lesson focuses on constructing and explaining fractions of fractions.
"I'd like you to draw one-third of one-third," Ball says. Students get busy writing their answers out; some whisper and fidget.
Through the day and its multiple lessons, Ball makes a point to connect with each student, get each student to speak in class and build routines for the class.

Accountable for learning

Nearly 200 people attended Ball's workshop this summer from across the United States, including lawmakers, parents and graduate students. Among them was Colleen Kuusinen, an education doctoral student at U-M.
Kuusinen said she has been watching how Ball leads a classroom discussion and how she positions it so students are learning from each other and not just her.
"She talks about the purposes behind discussions. For me as a teacher, I was never expressly taught about how to lead a discussion or the purpose of leading a discussion. It's very illuminating to hear her talk about what she does and the decisions she makes."
Beth Christensen, a fifth-grade math teacher at Pittsburgh's King School, said Ball establishes a culture where not only kids are held accountable for learning, but teachers are too.
"It's refreshing. It's a shame we don't have that in our school. Teachers are collaborators and learners. We see ourselves as education researchers," Christensen said. "There are so many decisions you make in a day. It's hard not to be paralyzed by fear."
State Board of Education member Eileen Weiser, who spent an afternoon observing Ball in the lab, said every teacher she knows truly wants to reach children and make a difference.
"It's very clear if we approach this very differently and make sure every child understands and knows basic concepts and how to use them, you can change a kid's life," Weiser said. "We can watch kids coming up and not learning math. If a teacher doesn't have these tools in their toolbox, it won't work."

Teaching made more visible

Michigan, which produces about 7,000 teachers a year, has 34 teacher preparation programs at higher education institutions. A recent ranking by the Michigan Department of Education listed four programs as "low-performing," three as considered "at-risk," nine as satisfactory and the rest as exemplary.
This fall, state Superintendent Mike Flanagan shut parts of teaching programs at Lake Superior State University and Olivet College after both were tagged as low-performing for several years.
The rankings are based on state exam pass rates, program completion and teacher exit surveys.
"I hope it's gotten the attention of all the deans. I think we do have the best teacher prep institutions in the country, but it's not ready for my granddaughter, who is using an iPad at age 2. What we want is quality," Flanagan said.
Armen Hratchian, vice president for education systems at Excellent Schools Detroit, said that considering the growing focus on accountability and teacher performance in Michigan, the state lacks opportunities for teachers to reflect on what works and to work on their craft.
Teachers can improve over time if given the right tools, said Hratchian, who observed Ball in the lab this summer.
"Teaching our kids is the most important profession there is. We should have a definition of what a prepared teacher looks like. We don't. I think that's huge challenge," he said. "We should be doing more on the front end and not hope that teachers learn how to teach while teaching."
Ball said the lab makes teaching more open so people can see the work 3 million people are doing in the United States. "It's actually pretty hard … this makes it more visible that teaching is complex work you can learn to do better. It doesn't take being some special person, but you need to learn how to do it and that is the central message. And we need to provide better opportunities for teachers to learn," she said.
jchambers@detroitnews.com
(313) 222-2269

Oakland Schools community forums tell parents what Lansing Republicans are up to

     There is no other way to describe what is going on in Lansing right now. They are out to end public education as we know it. From parent takeovers of schools to an endless stream of charter schools, they are out to steamroll anybody not paying attention and they are doing it in the silly season of the legislature. With a changeover happening at the beginning of the year, Republicans know there best chance to get what they want is in the waning days of the 2012 legislative season. Oakland Schools superintendent Vickie Markavitch has been touring various districts and legislators have been receiving communications from parents. The Oakland Press story is below. v v

Parents: We are losing control of our schools



 
Close to 2,000 parents and community members have attended meetings around Oakland County called by education leaders who are critical of legislation being pushed in the lame duck session.

Yet another meeting has been added to the series that started last week. A meeting is planned from 7 to 9 p.m. today at the Harding Administration Center in Ferndale.

Vickie Markavitch, Oakland Schools superintendent, said despite opposition, legislators still hope to pass the bills before the session ends.

Markavitch and other educators fear that current proposed reform may create a separate state-wide school system under the Education Achievement Authority that would accept any student in Michigan; a step that could dismantle the existing public school system.
They also are concerned that the legislation will open the door to allow a myriad of new privately run public charter schools that could select specific students, thereby discriminating against students who don’t fit their criteria.

Markavitch said parents and community members who have turned out for the series of meetings have been “very alarmed at the direction Lansing is taking around public education reform.

“They are very concerned about losing local control of their schools and losing community focus for their schools,” Markavitch said.

“The other concern I hear from people is the degree to which the for-profit corporate world seems to be entering the for-profit education in charter schools, not just here but everywhere.”

However, state Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Auburn Hills, former chairman of the House Education Committee, said there is no conspiracy to create a separate system for all Michigan students. He said the bill proposing the creation of selective charter schools that would be run only for certain students and discriminate against others “is not on the agenda at all,” in this lame duck session. However, he thinks the so-called “parent trigger bill” that allows parents and teachers to create a charter school from a failing school, will pass. And he hopes the EAA bill will pass during this lame duck session.

McMillin doesn’t deny the bill to create the Education Achievement Authority has become controversial, but he said the new statewide system would only operate the lowest performing 5 percent of schools. 
 
He said there was some language that could have allowed more than that, but “We took it out and made it only the bottom 5 percent.”

“The bottom 5 percent of schools would get into a reform office with the state superintendent; but for two years he’s done nothing,” McMillin said.

“We need to do something,” McMillin said, noting the ACLU is suing the state because the Constitution requires the state to provide and educate children, “and these kids aren’t getting that.”

“Anything is better than these options of just give it more time or throw more money at it.”

However, in a press release from the Michigan Department of Education, officials point out that there have been many reforms in education approved in the past couple of years that are still being implemented.

“We need to let the system stabilize and decompress,” said State Superintendent Mike Flanagan, before adding more.

Flanagan has been opposed to the automatic transfer of schools into the EAA if they are in the lowest-achieving five percent for three consecutive years, regardless of whether they are making academic progress.

Flanagan also maintains that the appointment of the State Redesign Officer should remain with the state superintendent, not under the governor. He argues that the EAA should not be exempted from any school laws, and said vacant school buildings should not be automatically available for sale or lease.

“I believe there is merit in codifying the EAA and providing a mechanism for our most struggling schools in Michigan that persistently are unable to help their students achieve,” Flanagan said. “However, this legislation includes several provisions that are of deep concern to me and will impact schools across Michigan.”

On Monday, Markavitch spoke to about 500 people in the first of two sessions at Rochester High School. She was joined by the superintendents of the Rochester, Troy and Avondale school districts, who agreed with her that it’s time for residents to contact their legislators.  

Markavitch said there has been an effort to get public money for private education for at least 20 years.

“Their agenda has been to denounce and then defund public education,” she said. “It’s a well-financed agenda and it is succeeding in our state.”

The superintendents all urged residents to contact their legislators.

According to capwiz.com, a system being used to track emails regarding the opposition to state officials, Markavitch said the governor has received more than 2,500 emails; and every representative in the state has received a different number, the lowest being 40 to 60 in areas outside of Oakland County.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Pontiac Superintendent suspended for schools turning in the MEAP late to state

 

Pontiac school administrator put on leave after state receives MEAP tests late


Failure to turn in one school’s Michigan Education Assessment Program test results to the state by deadline this fall has resulted in a Pontiac school district official being put on administrative leave while an investigation is underway.

Pontiac school Superintendent Brian Dougherty said the investigation was launched into the handling of the test results from Whitmer Human Resource Center elementary after they were turned in 19 days past the state deadline.

The district’s assessment coordinator was put on administrative leave until the investigation is completed later this week, said Dougherty, who would not release the name of the administrator and would not go into detail about what happened.

“We are still wrapping up the investigation as to what occurred,” Dougherty said Tuesday afternoon.


The MEAP tests were completed at the building but did not meet the filing deadlines.

“We have been working to get the scores. I want my teachers to have that data because that’s what we use to do intervention with students,” Dougherty said.

Teachers look at the data for the class as a whole for individual students to determine what steps to take to help students succeed.

Rumors that the principal of WHRC was suspended are not true, Dougherty said.

However, the principal of Herrington Elementary has been put on administrative leave while an investigation into a personnel matter is underway at that school.

The superintendent said he could not comment further on either situation until the investigations were complete.

Contact Diana Dillaber Murray at 248-745-4638 or email diana.dillaber@oakpress, or Twitter @DDillybar.

Pontiac Superintendent put on leave after MEAP scores 19 days late

     Brian Doherty just took the helm of the Pontiac School District earlier this year and already he is in hot water for the less than stellar work of administrators in the district. In a story filed by Diana Dillabar Murray,  Doherty was put under a leave while an investigation is currently being conducted into why two schools were late turning in their MEAP scores. WHRC was 19 days late turning their scores into the state and Doherty is the CEO of the district and is accountable to the state.

Pontiac school administrator put on leave after state receives MEAP tests late


Failure to turn in one school’s Michigan Education Assessment Program test results to the state by deadline this fall has resulted in a Pontiac school district official being put on administrative leave while an investigation is underway.

Pontiac school Superintendent Brian Dougherty said the investigation was launched into the handling of the test results from Whitmer Human Resource Center elementary after they were turned in 19 days past the state deadline.

The district’s assessment coordinator was put on administrative leave until the investigation is completed later this week, said Dougherty, who would not release the name of the administrator and would not go into detail about what happened.

“We are still wrapping up the investigation as to what occurred,” Dougherty said Tuesday afternoon.
The MEAP tests were completed at the building but did not meet the filing deadlines.

“We have been working to get the scores. I want my teachers to have that data because that’s what we use to do intervention with students,” Dougherty said.

Teachers look at the data for the class as a whole for individual students to determine what steps to take to help students succeed.

Rumors that the principal of WHRC was suspended are not true, Dougherty said.

However, the principal of Herrington Elementary has been put on administrative leave while an investigation into a personnel matter is underway at that school.

The superintendent said he could not comment further on either situation until the investigations were complete.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

College Used to Be the American Dream -- Now It's the American Nightmare


  Economy  
comments_image 94 COMMENTS

College Used to Be the American Dream -- Now It's the American Nightmare

Escalating delinquency rates make student loans look like the new subprime.
 
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
 
Now that student loans are undeniably in bubble territory, the officialdom is starting to wake up and take notice. Evidence that students were taking on so much debt as a group that it was undermining their ability to be Good American Consumers wasn’t enough. A recent New York Fed study found that 94% of recent graduates had borrowed to help pay for their education, and average debt levels among student borrowers is $23,000. Remember, that average includes seasoned borrowers, who presumably borrowed less and also in many cases reduced the principal amount of their loans, so the average amount borrowed by recent grads is certain to be higher. Student debt is senior to all other consumer debt; unlike, say, credit card balances, Social Security payments can be garnished to pay delinquencies. As a result, it has contributed to the fall in the homeownership rate, since many young people who want to buy a house can’t because their level of student debt prevents them from getting a mortgage.
But despite some pious noises about the burden that student loans place on young Americans, there’s been no willingness in the officialdom to do much about it. But that may finally be changing. The latest Federal Reserve data is grim.
Student loan delinquencies are getting into nosebleed territory. The Wall Street Journal, citing New York Fed data, tells us that student debt outstanding increased 4.6% in the last quarter. Repeat: in the last quarter. Annualized, that’s a 19.7% rate of increase* during a period when other consumer borrowings were on the decline. And this growth is taking place while borrower distress is becoming acute. 11% of the loans were 90+ days delinquent, up from 8.9% at the close of last quarter. The underlying credit picture is certain to be worse, since many borrowers aren’t even required to service loans (as in they are still in school or have gotten a postponement, which is available to the unemployed for a short period). And it was the only type of consumer debt to show rising delinquency rates.
This is the new subprime: escalating borrowing taking place as loan quality is lousy and getting worse. And in keeping with parallel to subprime, one of the big reasons is, to use a cliche from that product, anyone who can fog a mirror can get a loan.
The most popular type of loan, Stafford loans, allow undergraduates to borrow up to $57,500, no questions asked. Perversely, this practice, in isolation, looks rational. Look, if you could put borrowers in virtual debt slavery, would you care much about lending standards? All you need to worry about is death and those few cases where borrowers are so clearly unable to ever work for a decent amount of money that they can get their student debt that they can get their loans reduced or discharged.
Things are so bad that each media report seems able to present anecdotes more extreme than previous accounts. The WSJ found a recent graduate of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach whose education loans total nearly $230,000 for a college education that has enabled him to get a job that pays $60,000. And $184,500 of that total was borrowed by his unemployed, disabled mother through a program called Parent Plus.
The Administration’s responses look inadequate given the scale of the problem. From the WSJ:
In an effort to reduce defaults, the Education Department has tightened standards for loans to parents and grad students, prohibited federal lending to schools if more than a certain percentage of its graduates default over several years, and allowed borrowers to postpone payments during periods of “hardship.” The administration also has finalized rules that enable certain borrowers to have their remaining debt forgiven after 20 years, provided that they make monthly payments at 10% of discretionary income—down from the previous standard of 15%.
And no wonder, this Administration is as committed to “affordable education” as previous Administrations have been to “affordable homes“:
President Barack Obama championed easy-to-get loans during the campaign, calling higher education “an economic imperative in the 21st century.” A spokesman for Education Secretary Arne Duncan said the goal is “to make student loans available to as many people as possible,” and requiring minimum credit scores would block many Americans from going to college.
It isn’t hard to see why Team Obama is all on board with student debt peonage. Students have always been important forces in revolutionary movements: they are high functioning, live in dense communities, which facilitates organizing, and are naive enough to believe their actions can make a difference. Inescapable debt greatly increased the risk of fighting the established order; a mere arrest record hurts employment prospects. Of course, Republican criticism of overly generous student lending also has to be taken with a fistful of salt: Conservatives view higher education as indoctrination camps for socialism. So on odd days, they’ll try to rein in student funding and on even days, will blame unemployment on unskilled American workers losing out to the better trained and harder working Chinese. (This is not to deny that the US is in a serious higher education cost bubble, which in large measure is due to expenses that have nothing to do with the quality of teaching, such as much bigger and better paid administration staffs, and lavish facilities, like upscale gyms).
Like buying a house, getting a higher education was part of the American dream, a way to invest to build a secure future. Reckless lending and the costly efforts to socialize the losses are turning both into American nightmares.
–––––
*Annualized is NOT the quarterly rate X 4. It’s treated as a compound growth rate. And yes, I checked the WSJ figure against the Fed’s second quarter household debt and credit report to make sure they did mean a 4.6% increase in the quarter, as opposed to a 4.6% annualized rate of increase. This is also the start of a new school term for most students, so one would expect new students entering college to produce a bigger increase than in the other quarters of the year