![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi802NTNWYTZk7scGAqmlZEwdyeyYL4-nrd5T4ifmZslNGwGK0YJAgYXLt5YvaGeK6vu51p-VXo2W6jBwowHyTj7wE4VdyjSHE6u7oz5nKWgtPqckw-NAuxFvNgK0I33-ISXLrIGq54l5G8/s1600/teacher+cartoon.jpg)
FEWER GEORGIANS CHOOSE TEACHING
Teaching is tough
As an editorial writer, I spent
years writing about predatory lending and the resulting subprime
mortgage crisis. Those editorials sometimes prompted rebukes from
readers, who argued the blame for rampant mortgage fraud fell on
uninformed borrowers rather than unscrupulous lenders.
Readers expressed a surprising
tolerance toward bankers who earned millions on easy credit policies and
tempting teaser rates that targeted riskier borrowers.
When I began writing about education
policy, I saw a far different level of accountability demanded of
teachers, who earn average starting salaries of $30,000 a year.
The teachers of Elm Street incurred
more blame for struggling schools than the wolves of Wall Street for a
collapsed economy. The animosity
toward teachers is striking,
especially given that they work in a low-paid profession that’s now
being asked to perform the educational near-equivalent of turning water
into wine.
The laundry list of goals we now
have imposed on teachers and schools has expanded well beyond teaching
math and reading. Beyond creating engaging lessons, their to-do list now
includes curing poverty, leveling the playing field and providing a
moral compass. And we also would like schools to persuade students to
eat more broccoli, watch less TV and floss regularly.
At the same time, we’re rolling out
unproven value-added evaluations that measure the effectiveness of
teachers on the performance of their students on standardized
tests. For those teachers working
in disciplines where there are no tests, such as foreign languages or
the arts, we are rushing to design alternative yardsticks. Band
students, for example, may be judged on how well they know scales. No
one has explained how we can distinguish whether a failing grade means
the teacher didn’t teach scales, or the student never bothered to
practice.
So, it shouldn’t surprise us fewer Georgians are choosing to go into the classroom.
According to a recent AJC story, 12,436 students received
teaching certificates for the first
time in 2007-08. Two years later, only 8,520 college students earned
teaching certificates, and the number hasn’t risen since, says the
Georgia Professional Standards Commission.
Some striking facts from the story
by AJC reporter Eric Stirgus: State data shows there were 9,259 fewer
teachers in Georgia at the end of the 2012-13 school year than four
years ago. The number of Georgians working in local government
educational services declined 9 percent over the past five years,
greater than in any major
Georgia industry.
The decrease in people seeking
teaching certificates is making it hard for districts to find candidates
for the already hard-to-fill slots such as foreign language, special
education, math and science. Some South Georgia school administrators
told the AJC the decline has led to more substitute teachers and larger
class sizes.
The state is now raising the bar to
become a teacher. But without raising the respect afforded the
profession, we may find fewer people willing to attempt that higher bar.
What do you think? Should Georgia be raising standards for prospective teachers when they cannot fill the available jobs posted each year? Supply and demand suggests that raising standards might not be a great solution right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment